<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 3 Open Source (X)HTML/CSS Editors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://talkingincircles.net/2009/01/10/top-3-open-source-xhtmlcss-editors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://talkingincircles.net/2009/01/10/top-3-open-source-xhtmlcss-editors/</link>
	<description>Every time you think you're talking you're just moving your mouth.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:58:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: probabilityZero</title>
		<link>http://talkingincircles.net/2009/01/10/top-3-open-source-xhtmlcss-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-48905</link>
		<dc:creator>probabilityZero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingincircles.net/?p=432#comment-48905</guid>
		<description>I kinda agree with you. Recently I&#039;ve been using Topstyle for xhtml/css (commercial program... it has no WYSIWYG editor, but has excellent auto-completion and built-in validation/testing tools), but even back when I used Dreamweaver I never used the WYSIWYG feature -- really, that&#039;s why I decided to ditch it... I wasn&#039;t getting my money&#039;s worth because I ended up writing all the XHTML myself.

Of the programs I mentioned above, Bluefish seems like a great choice for someone who writes all his or her own markup without a fancy editor. It&#039;s practically an html/php IDE anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kinda agree with you. Recently I&#8217;ve been using Topstyle for xhtml/css (commercial program&#8230; it has no WYSIWYG editor, but has excellent auto-completion and built-in validation/testing tools), but even back when I used Dreamweaver I never used the WYSIWYG feature &#8212; really, that&#8217;s why I decided to ditch it&#8230; I wasn&#8217;t getting my money&#8217;s worth because I ended up writing all the XHTML myself.</p>
<p>Of the programs I mentioned above, Bluefish seems like a great choice for someone who writes all his or her own markup without a fancy editor. It&#8217;s practically an html/php IDE anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnny</title>
		<link>http://talkingincircles.net/2009/01/10/top-3-open-source-xhtmlcss-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-48904</link>
		<dc:creator>johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingincircles.net/?p=432#comment-48904</guid>
		<description>bah, who needs anything more than syntax highlighting for html?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bah, who needs anything more than syntax highlighting for html?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stelt</title>
		<link>http://talkingincircles.net/2009/01/10/top-3-open-source-xhtmlcss-editors/comment-page-1/#comment-48565</link>
		<dc:creator>stelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://talkingincircles.net/?p=432#comment-48565</guid>
		<description>I really have to try Amaya soon.
For read/write reasons and for SVG capabilities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really have to try Amaya soon.<br />
For read/write reasons and for SVG capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
