Answer: there’s nothing wrong with it. It improves the lives of children by bringing them into loving homes. Where’s the problem with that?
Apparently conservatives (such as luckily-not-president McCain) believe that allowing gay and lesbian couples to adopt is somehow bad or immoral. McCain had this to say about it:
I think that we’ve proven that both parents are important in the success of a family so, no, I don’t believe in gay adoption.
So, better to leave them in an orphanage rather than to let them be adopted by what he think is a less than ideal family? I’ll even agree with him that having two same-sex parents rather than a traditional mother and father could potentially be detrimental in their development (traditional psychology places importance on both parental figures), but not nearly as detrimental as, say, having a single parent, or having one or both parents be assholes, or living in a poor family, or any number of things — big surprise, not every single child has a perfect life. It’s certainly no-where near as bad for the child as having neither a mother or a father. In fact, there’s plenty of research that shows that children of gay parents turn out just fine.
When The Daily Show covered this issue a while ago, Samantha Bee jokingly referred to “gay parents and their soon-to-be-gay children,” and I think this might actually be the problem conservatives have with this issue, deep down. I’ve seen research going either way about whether children raised by homosexual parents are more likely to identify later in life as homosexual (most of what I’ve seen says it isn’t true), but in some ways it makes sense — they’re already exposed to it so they know it’s “okay” and are more willing to accept their own sexual orientation, rather than trying to repress it or attempt to deny it. If this were true I’d have no problem with it, and neither should you, dear reader; there’s nothing immoral about being homosexual, so a higher chance of identifying as one is not important. I think some conservatives take this way too far, and incorporate it into their “gay people are trying to corrupt our culture” conspiracy, thinking that homosexual parents are out there infecting innocent children with “the gay.” That whole world-view is so absurd (and popular) that I try not to think about it.
So, I’ve done my best to imagine the point of view of someone who opposes gay adoption. Short of Christian fundies that think gays are evil or homophobes that hate gays irrationally (those two groups overlap a lot), I don’t see any reason for a rational person to oppose gay adoption. But, I don’t see any rational reason for anyone to oppose gay marraige either, so I guess the two go hand-in-hand.
14 Comments
damn right there’s nothing wrong with it…
i remember that segment from the daily show… funny stuff
and yeah, better leave the little kids in the orphinage than give them a family that might turn them gay… wtf are these people smoking?!
i think this website helped with our group project
Children are best raised by a mother and a father who are in a committed relationship, like marriage. It’s been that way for thousands of years, and attempts to do social experiementing with children in the name of political correctness is absurd.
james: You didn’t read the article. I addressed that point at the top of the post.
Probabilityzero,
The literature you and your cohorts site is absurd. 97% percent of the population is “hetro” therefore 97% of all adoptable children are “hetro”. If a child is placed in a gay household, the surroundings will send confusing messages that will, in time, lead the child to act on homosexual feelings, that most people have at sometime in their lives, and possibly damage the childs self image. There is a natural level of homosexuals in the population and they should be accepted and loved for who they are. But to place a heterosexual child in a homosexual house hold is just as wrong as trying to convert a person to a different sexuality.
I was raised in a completely heterosexual community and I turned out gay. Weird huh? According to Ben’s logic, I would have became heterosexual since I was raised in a heterosexual environment. Yet, I still developed feelings for other guys without ANY exposure to ANY sort of homosexuality. Sexuality is something that developed within me naturally and was not influenced dramatically by any outside forces.
If I were to adopt a child with another man (which I can’t right now because I’m too young…I’m still in school) I would never impose my sexuality on my children or “convert” them. I’ll just say “if you’re straight, that’s cool. If you’re gay, that’s cool too. I don’t care what gender you like.” As long as they know that they are loved no matter what, I’ll be happy.
I do not know if I articulated my point as much as I wanted to. All I can say to Ben is, your statement is very ignorant. =)
i think that if someone wants to be gay then that is their decision.
im all for gay marriage and gay adoption im straight myself but very pro gay etc im even doing my dissertation for uni on gay adoption and harm to the child here my findings there is NO harm at all to the child its the whole nature nurture debate its in a persons nature if they are gay or not , NOT the way they were brought up!!!!! this is a birtish girls views mind you not american i just dont see why people are so against it as long as the child has a loving safe secure environment then whats the problem!
there is no logic behind the ” if they live with the gays they will turn out gay” statment. same sex couples have not been allowed to adopt only until recent years, which means the millions of gays that there are were raised in hetrosexual households. being raised by gays does not insure that they will come out gay. people want to claim that by giving the gays the right to adopt it will emotionally/mentally disturb the child but they act as if waiting for a loving and willing parent to take you away while you wait in a foster home isnt damaging to ones mind. cmon people
i am doing a debate in my ethics class on gay and lesbian adoption.this article is exactlly what i want to say finaly i found someone with an opinion, and an awsome one at that!u rock and have helped me find a way to say what i think. i completly agree that 2 same sex parents are better than the parents the child had at birth these people actually want the child and will love them probly more than any other couple b/c they had to bust their ass longer and harder to get this child. peace out:)!
in the Bible is states it plainly that man and another man is totally wrong as with girl and girl.
so its totally going against the Bible first of all and second God intended for man and women to be together
he didnt make adam and john, he made adam(man) and out of adam he made Eve(women) if he wanted to be man and man or women and women he would have made that from the beginning!
Propabilityzero – you’re such a freaking ignorant saddistic freak. You want them poor children to be massacred by those perverts. I always knew that atheists are somewhat unadopted to the society, but what you show by yourself… It’s disgusting. That’s what I say – and believe me, I’m not the only one.
i think its better for a child to have parents no matter if the couple is gay or straight. if the child will be loved and taken care of whats the problem? if children didnt get adopted they will become angry with the world and could start a life of violence. now ask yourselves would it be better for a gay couple to love and care for a child, or have that child grow up without a family and most likely become a criminal? the safer way to go is to let them adopt the child.
2 Trackbacks
[...] absurd is the argument that children will somehow be harmed because of gay marriage. I’ve touched on this issue in the past, but the opponents of gay marriage never really address these points. Really, this argument falls [...]
[...] case is sure to add fuel to the controversy over the issue of gay adoption. On a pro-gay website, a post titled “What’s wrong with gay adoption?” claims: …there’s nothing [...]